https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=acquire-heed-to-your-prospective-customers-they-are-likely-to-allow-you-know-all-about-sexy-pornography Watters, argues that, at the very least as applied to § 3583(k) revocations and subsequent prosecutions, Haymond abrogates our double jeopardy precedent. Subsequent to Haymond, our court docket addressed a defendant's argument that Haymond produced a revocation sentence underneath a unique provision, § 3583(g), a double jeopardy violation. Watters's double jeopardy argument is based on § 3583(k). Mon, 05 Sep 2022 12:22:33 UTC en