https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=hearken-to-your-clients-they-might-permit-you-know-all-about-sexy-pornography Watters, argues that, at least as used to § 3583(k) revocations and subsequent prosecutions, Haymond abrogates our double jeopardy precedent. Subsequent to Haymond, our court addressed a defendant's argument that Haymond designed a revocation sentence under a diverse provision, § 3583(g), a double jeopardy violation. Watters's double jeopardy argument is centered on § 3583(k). Thu, 22 Sep 2022 01:43:31 UTC en