The small or large intestine is indicative of pneumatosis intestinalis. This situation refers to a necrotizing enterocolitis and can be considered as an indication for urgent surgery. Conservative management is recommended initially when these criteria are absent [50]. Badgwell et al. suggested better outcomes if it was possible to delay surgery until recovery from neutropenia [51]. General suppor
The small or large intestine is indicative of pneumatosis intestinalis. This situation refers to a necrotizing enterocolitis and can be considered as an indication for urgent surgery. Conservative management is recommended initially when these criteria are absent [50]. Badgwell et al. suggested better outcomes if it was possible to delay surgery until recovery from neutropenia [51]. General suppor
On/collection or septic shock become evident in the later course.Vasopressor regimen during septic shockThe intestinal tract is a common site of infection in neutropenic patients. Neutropenic enterocolitis, also known as typhlitis is a life-threatening condition due to inflammatory/hemorrhagic/necrotizing involvement of the lower intestinal tract [50]. Criteria for neutropenic enterocolitis associ
On/collection or septic shock become evident in the later course.Vasopressor regimen during septic shockThe intestinal tract is a common site of infection in neutropenic patients. Neutropenic enterocolitis, also known as typhlitis is a life-threatening condition due to inflammatory/hemorrhagic/necrotizing involvement of the lower intestinal tract [50]. Criteria for neutropenic enterocolitis associ
The small or large intestine is indicative of pneumatosis intestinalis. This situation refers to a necrotizing enterocolitis and can be considered as an indication for urgent surgery. Conservative management is recommended initially when these criteria are absent [50]. Badgwell et al. suggested better outcomes if it was possible to delay surgery until recovery from neutropenia [51]. General suppor
Eared not to be influenced. In ICU, in a retrospective study of 28 neutropenic patients who received G-CSF compared to 33 patients who did notZafrani and Azoulay BMC Infectious Diseases 2014, 14:512 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/14/Page 6 ofreceived G-CSF, Gruson et al. did not found any difference in terms of clinical outcome and occurrence of nosocomial infections [56]. Moreover, as men
Eared not to be influenced. In ICU, in a retrospective study of 28 neutropenic patients who received G-CSF compared to 33 patients who did notZafrani and Azoulay BMC Infectious Diseases 2014, 14:512 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/14/Page 6 ofreceived G-CSF, Gruson et al. did not found any difference in terms of clinical outcome and occurrence of nosocomial infections [56]. Moreover, as men
S that have been suggested include delayed or prolonged neutropenia [46], and pneumonia [48]. G-CSF should be avoided in this context (cf infra).Zafrani and Azoulay BMC Infectious Diseases 2014, 14:512 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/14/Page 5 ofCatheter removalDeciding when to remove CVC is a common problem in neutropenic patients in ICU. In patients with bacteremia due to Enterobacteriace