Moreover, as talked about down below in Division 5, the remaining knowledgeable evidence is insufficient to support Smoot's conviction, and so double jeopardy ideas preclude her from being retried for that offense. 2141, 57 L.Ed.second 1 (1978) (when there is insufficient proof to help a conviction, the defendant are unable to be retried without the need of violating the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution).