<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>The Meetingpoint at Slavyanski.net / bryansantos / Upvoted</title>
<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020</link>
<description>Your Source for Social News and Networking</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 21:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[9 Clarification Why Having An Exceptional Porn W Is Not Enough]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=9-clarification-why-having-an-exceptional-porn-w-is-not-enough</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=9-clarification-why-having-an-exceptional-porn-w-is-not-enough"><![CDATA[9 Clarification Why Having An Exceptional Porn W Is Not Enough]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[The storytelling is as clunky Fifty Shades, and the story has been similarly chided for its misogynistic undertones. The previous object of a Time protect tale in 1990 grew to become the object of a withering ad hominem backlash. There is a tale that goes with that, but I'll preserve that 'til afterwards. ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 21:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>bryansantos</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=9-clarification-why-having-an-exceptional-porn-w-is-not-enough</guid>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
