<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>The Meetingpoint at Slavyanski.net / boxoyster4 / All</title>
<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020</link>
<description>Your Source for Social News and Networking</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 11:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
	<title><![CDATA[For removal in patients with septic shock, without an obvious other]]></title>
	<link>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=for-removal-in-patients-with-septic-shock-without-an-obvious-other-4</link>
	<source url="https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=for-removal-in-patients-with-septic-shock-without-an-obvious-other-4"><![CDATA[For removal in patients with septic shock, without an obvious other]]></source>
	<description><![CDATA[For removal in patients with septic shock, without an obvious other source of infection as the absence of local signs and symptoms are notoriously insensitive in the neutropenic host. In a cohort study of neutropenic cancer patients admitted to the ICU for severe sepsis or septic shock, Legrand et al. found that routinely removing indwelling catheters early on in patients with no other detectable  ]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 11:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<author>boxoyster4</author>
	<category>News</category>
	<votes>1</votes>
	<guid>https://slavyanski.net/sb2020/story.php?title=for-removal-in-patients-with-septic-shock-without-an-obvious-other-4</guid>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
