two. While the Court does not overrule Bowers holding that homosexual sodomy is not a “fundamental proper,” it is worthy of noting that the “societal reliance” upon that aspect of the final decision has been sizeable as nicely. ” in the adoption of her grandchildren) Doe v. Wigginton, 21 F.3d 733, 739—740 (CA6 1994) (relying on Bowers in rejecting a prisoners claimed “fundamental right” to on-demand HIV screening) Schowengerdt v.